Tag Archive for 'vote'

Weekly Links: Secret Homosexual Communion, Mike Huckabee and Evolution

The Archbishop of Canterbury crosses diocesan boundary without permission to preside at clandestine Eucharist for gays. See also The Times Online for a bit less judgmental article. This will likely fuel the fire considerably in the ongoing arguments about communion in general.

Of course we had this story before they did, but now the mainstream media is picking up the Return To Tradition among religious groups.

Here is a story about Christians Suing Christians in England.

Politics
“Why we should care what candidates think about biological evolution,” by Ronald Bailey at Reason magazine.

CBS News has observed that Mike Huckabee seems to be taking his talking points from Ron Paul now.

Why Kim Riddlebarger won’t vote for Huckabee

www.bigthink.com launched on Monday. The New York Times has an article on it.

For the first time in a century, Britain now exceeds the US in standard of living.

FBI wiretaps dropped due to unpaid bills

I voted.

Two days ago I voted (early) in the Dallas mayoral run-off election. I didn’t really know that much about either candidate. I had heard their positive ads about themselves, their negative ads about the other guy, and a bit of commentary about them both. I visited both of their websites to see what they had to say about themselves. Not being that much into politics, I didn’t see anything special to make me vote for either of them. I never did hear what party they belong to.

However, I ended up voting for the straight man, and conversely, against the gay man. Yes, (gasp!) I voted based on their sexual preference.

Why did I do that? I do not see myself as a card-carrying member of the right-wing moral majority who strives to “take our country back to a land of Christian values.” But, in reality, I do end up voting like them most of the time. My vote is not so much to legislate morality as it is to make a statement about what I wish the world were like.

For example: I wish there were no abortions. Therefore, I vote against anything that legalizes or encourages abortion and I vote for anything that speaks against or discourages abortion. Do I think that will end abortions? No, unfortunately. Do I think if abortions are illegal then we will have a Christian nation? No, not at all. Laws do not change what is in people’s hearts and often don’t even change how people act. Nevertheless, the principle still stands: I want to live in a world without abortions, so I vote that way.

I struggle with knowing what role to take in my country’s affairs. After thinking about it quite a bit, I’ve realized that the dissonance I experience is because the fact that I’m a Christian is much more important to me than the fact that I’m an American. Physically I am at home as an American citizen, but spiritually I am displaced as an alien—I don’t belong here, and the affairs of my (or any) human government are really only incidental to my life. My allegiance is to a higher potentate, and in many, many ways, it really doesn’t matter what laws are passed or who is elected. True, certain laws may make my life richer (or not) or happier (or not), but I view all of that as pretty much irrelevant, because I don’t really belong here.

Back to the Dallas mayoral election. When I apply my principles to the election, it comes out this way: I do not want to live in a world where homosexuality is considered normal and on the same par as heterosexuality, so I voted against the man who is endorsed by the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund. However, if this guy wins the election, Dallas will not be any less Christian than if he didn’t, I know that. But I will have voted in concert with my own political principle: I’d simply rather live in a place that did not affirm homosexuality as just another possible lifestyle.

Perhaps, Perhaps, Perhaps

*Note* I am studying for my medical boards (which I take in six days) so this will be a quick and general rundown of my thoughts between studying tentorial herniations and allergic polyarteritis nodosa. Don’t ask me, I still don’t know.

Ask somebody, anybody, who Ron Paul is, and you’ll likely get one of two answers: One, of course, being most commonly “who?”, which is not surprising coming from a country where only one in seven Americans aged 18-24 can find Iraq on a map. The second most popular, being of course “that guy running in the wrong party.” Daily show host Jon Stewart asked it, and after the second GOP debate, it was the first question asked. So what, right? Not that he really has much a chance, according to the most recent Gallup polls. It’s a moot point.

I guess then, that is the point.

Think back to the 2000 election. By a narrow margin, Republican George W. Bush nudges out Democrat Al Gore by less than a 1% margin in the popular vote. Green Party candidate Ralph Nader takes 2.73%, and hatred of party-line Democrats everywhere. The cry of “Ralph Nader stole the election from Gore” echoed down the the left-hand side of the streets of New England and California, while Kleenex stock skyrocketed. Their biggest pre-election fear was realized…a vote for Nader was a vote for Bush. Wasn’t that how it went? (Politics is perception, isn’t that how is goes?)

Or was it that there were issues out there that were big enough to swing some people away. Or perhaps, just maybe, some Americans discovered they didn’t like to be pigeon-holed into left/right political box.

According to this article, we could have a similar “problem” on our hands, only this time it is within a party itself.

The other important thing to note is that Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate to oppose the war. This is critical because it means that the anti-war Republican vote will almost exclusively be on his side. And the pro-war vote would be split among all the other candidates..

While this is more than likely a far stretch, there is no doubt that Ron Paul and his campaign has given the Good Ole Boy Republican Club its fair share of eye twitches and sweaty jock itch, especially considering his views on the Iraq Conflict War. Not to mention many anti-war moderates/independents, tired of the two-party taffy pull, might find his brand of realism and staunch opposition appealing. Recent polls indicate that opposition to the war is at about 67%. Of the 169 million registered voters, only 43% are registered Democrats, making this well beyond a Democrat-only issue. Not to mention that the Iraq War may be big enough to cause a pull on these “fringe” voters, especially for those living in states not requiring registration to vote in primaries.

So let us pretend that Ron Paul manages to throw a monkey wrench into the giant GOP machine, not by winning, but by swinging some votes to upset the would-of-should-of-been future Mr. Forerunner, yielding the crown to a lesser-likely hero. Will the streets of Anytown, USA run red with pachyderm tears while cries of “how did we let this happen to us” echo across Middle America? Or will we, as Americans, finally realize that we can’t have our cake and eat it too, for we demand what we aren’t willing to take.

We demand a difference and change in each election, but question any deviation from the standard. We occasionally give 3rd parties a glancing nod, then frustratingly cast them into the “wasted vote” pile as we reluctantly choose a lesser evil. When these 3rd party candidates run under that larger umbrella, they are immediately chastised and questioned about their sincerity of perceived polarization. “You’re different” they cry, “perhaps you made a mistake and meant to be over there, playing on their team?!” Why must the difference you crave fit into that box you’ve built? Perhaps, America, just perhaps, you’ll find that choice is more important than the allegiance and alignment.

So, despite the opinions of many who enjoy comparing the likelihood of election with political importance (like our very own Darius. BTW, welcome!), it may be a little too soon to start picking out your proverbial wallpaper with your bedfellow top-runner.

America may not be done surprising you.


Archives

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'vote' tag.

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'vote' tag.

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'vote' tag.