Tag Archive for 'morality'

Links: Ron Paul is Right and Always Has Been Right About the Economy

While we all should try and maintain our sense of respect and professionalism during a time of crisis, I need to say it at least once: Ron Paul told you so. So many laughed at him during the debates (literally) when he warned that this would happen.

But it’s not just that Ron Paul, the man, is right - Paul studies libertarian, Austrian free-market economics, the adherents of which have predicted every major bust period in the past century. Economics is not the knowledge of complicated sets of mathematic formulas and equations - but an understanding of logic and human action. It is not about pragmatism, “common sense” or making accounting changes to meet challenges - but a philosophy of reason which explains everything from the growth of government to the disputes of children over toys. Even Jesus dying on the cross can be explained by economic logic. A failure to understand this fundamental truth is going to lead to fear, panic and vast quantities of destruction.

I have been ridiculed here, and in other place because free-market capitalism is really just this funny idea that never works in real life, and should be abandoned in favor of market “stabilization” measures such as price controls, anti-trust regulations, legislated morality or mercantilism. As if capitalism is just a “textbook thing” or an unworkable theory which never leaves the pages. But capitalism is in the textbook in the same way that gravity is - you might not agree with it, or believe it, but it is there and you can be aware that it is all around you as the natural order. Trying to fight it will always be a losing battle because you are fighting a force like gravity - but refusing to acknowledge the omnipresence of the natural economic order will result in a harder fall as ignorant explanations remove one father from it.

I encourage everyone to go back and watch the GOP debates with Ron Paul. Watch how he says that the economy is going to falter, how our credit rating with our debtors (China) is falling, how the Fed will inflate deliberately, how our military will be called home because of a lack of funds, how Fannie and Freddie will fail, how the housing market will fail. But Paul does not merely outline and accurately predict the problems, he knows the solutions - not because he’s a god (although to those deceived by economic ignorance, it may seem like strange magic)  but because he’s read a few books on the subject. I would recommend everyone read this one to start.

So, the weekly links on the economy read like Ron Paul’s debate answers in 2007 and speeches from as early as 2003:

The Empire Strikes Out - The US Economic Crisis

China Rumoured to Cease Lending to US

Ron Paul confronts Ben Bernake

Ron Paul’s CNN front page article

The U.S. has slipped markedly in economic freedom since the year 2000:

Economic freedom around the world remains on the rise but it has declined notably in the U.S. since the year 2000, according to an authoritative study released today by the Cato Institute and Canada’s Fraser Institute.

In 2000 the U.S. was the second-freest economy listed in Economic Freedom of the World, an annual report written by James Gwartney from Florida State University and Robert Lawson from Auburn University. This year the U.S. has fallen to 8th place, behind Hong Kong (ranked in first place), Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Chile, and Canada.

More significant than the U.S.’s drop in the rankings is its fall in the freedom ratings: on a scale of 0-10, the U.S. fell from 8.55 in 2000 to 8.04, according to the Economic Freedom of the World Report: 2008 Annual Report. Only five countries have experienced a greater decline over the same time period: Zimbabwe, Argentina, Niger, Venezuela, and Guyana.

Army to begin patrolling American cities in October

In Foreign Lands
Satellite images show ethnic cleanout in Iraq:

Satellite images taken at night show heavily Sunni Arab neighborhoods of Baghdad began emptying before a U.S. troop surge in 2007, graphic evidence of ethnic cleansing that preceded a drop in violence, according to a report published on Friday.

“By the launch of the surge, many of the targets of conflict had either been killed or fled the country, and they turned off the lights when they left,” geography professor John Agnew of the University of California Los Angeles, who led the study, said in a statement.

“Essentially, our interpretation is that violence has declined in Baghdad because of intercommunal violence that reached a climax as the surge was beginning,” said Agnew, who studies ethnic conflict.

“Our findings suggest that the surge has had no observable effect, except insofar as it has helped to provide a seal of approval for a process of ethno-sectarian neighborhood homogenization that is now largely achieved,” Agnew’s team wrote in their report.

The Cold War II?

Game Review - Bioshock: Welcome to Rapture

Bioshock Logo I am Andrew Ryan and I am here to ask you a question:
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his own brow?

No, says the man in Washington. It belongs to the poor.
No, says the man in the Vatican. It belongs to God.
No, says the man in Moscow. It belongs to everyone.

I rejected those answers. Instead, I chose something
different. I chose the impossible. I chose…
Rapture.

-Andrew Ryan

The year is 1946. Disillusioned with war and perceived religious and political authority, business mogul Andrew Ryan secretly begins building an escape, a utopia free from the parasites of Marxist altruism and religious scrutiny. He built Rapture, a city where man could build, where a man could make himself by his own merit, where a man could be free from moral entanglements and social obligations. He built “Rapture,” at the bottom of the sea. He invites all the great minds and free-thinkers to relish in his wonderland of libertopia, free to do as they please, how they please.

And then, in 1958, it all fell apart.

So begins the story of Bioshock, the newest game for XBOX 360 and PC from 2K, makers of System Shock and System Shock 2. Set in 1960, the story tells of an Objectivist dystopia at the height of ruin. You, the narrator, crash land into the mid-Atlantic near a mysterious island containing a lone lighthouse. You enter the lighthouse, board a bathysphere, and descend to the depths of Rapture. Leaking and crumbling, and apparently victim of its own design, you must fight the denizens of the genetically malformed and psychologically disturbed to discover its secrets, and its powers.

Unbridled by regulations and rules, scientists in Rapture discover the way to unlock the power of the human genome. Andrew Ryan creates (discovers?) Plasmids, a genetic code that gives humans additional strengths and powers including telekinesis, fire, ice and electricity and powered by EVE, a substance that acts as a fuel. Another substance, ADAM, enhances the ability of plasmids, but also weakens the physical/brain barrier, requiring more and more ADAM to maintain sanity. Soon, the residents of Rapture, horribly transfigured and addicted to ADAM, go crazy. And revolt.

The Philosophy of Rapture
Bioshock
raises two important issues behind its symbolism:
1) Is this a game showing the futility of Objectivism, and its consequences? or…2) is this a game showing that regardless of intentions, man eventually falls to its basest of levels?

The makers of this game never tell us, which allows much room for interpretation.

If we assume #1, then creators have made some inherent flaws and assumptions, through which most can be attributed to #2. But before we start, let’s begin with some basic definitions.

Objectivism (from Wikipedia, a decent summarization) states:

Objectivism holds that there is mind-independent reality; that individual persons are in contact with this reality through sensory perception; that human beings gain objective knowledge from perception by measurement and form valid concepts by measurement omission; that the proper moral purpose of one’s life is the pursuit of one’s own happiness or “rational self-interest”; that the only social system consistent with this morality is full respect for individual rights, embodied in pure, consensual laissez-faire capitalism; and that the role of art in human life is to transform abstract knowledge, by selective reproduction of reality, into a physical form—a work of art—that one can comprehend and respond to with the whole of one’s consciousness.

It is your moral duty to pursue your own self-interests, as long as those interests do not interfere or destroy the individual rights of others. This basic concept is key behind the objectivist movement, and a founding principle of (L)ibertarianism. It is also this concept that the game appears to make as its base in theory, but it could be argued that it was not Objectivism that brought Rapture down, but the fact that it was not quite Objectivist enough.

Food for Thought, and for Skeptics
Now I know by now many of you are thinking “BUT! IT’S JUST A GAME! YOU’RE CHASING SMOKE ON A WINDY DAY!” Well, possibly. But with it being the #1 selling game on XBOX, and with 9.8/10 or higher in most game review magazines, there is no doubt that this game will be played. Also, given its thought provoking plot, there is little doubt it will many raise questions. Consider also the Randian basis that this game builds upon, including the symbolism which alludes to famous works and characters of her novels. With names like Andrew Ryan….Frank Fontaine…Atlas…it’s not hard to see Ayn Rand, The Fountainhead, Atlas Shrugged, and notice it’s more than just coincidence. Like a good book, or a good movie, this game was meant to raise questions and be explored.
Continue reading ‘Game Review - Bioshock: Welcome to Rapture’

Nietzsche & Morality?

(I am pausing from the “Faith Problems” series until I can digest the next area sufficiently. In the meanwhile, I’ll be toying with different parts of Nietzsche’s works.)

It seems that many Christians claim morality. In some case, they even brag about it. Yet, this seems to be a disservice to . Why is it that Christians today seem to “play moral” without actually living it? I believe actually has insight into this. But, we must first disregard any prejudices of Nietzsche because, oftentimes, those are based on misconceptions. Instead of going through each prejudice and explaining the point of misconception, it’ll be easier to remove them all and deal with them later.

Nietzsche writes in his preface to The Birth of Tragedy that “Christian teaching…is, and wants to be, only moral and … relegates art, every art to the realm of lies” (BT, 5*). This can be expanded further. I believe Nietzsche is missing one point when it comes to American Evangelicals: most of them want to be seen as being moral, even if it is not the case. The media has given us numerous examples of popular preachers, pastors, etc, all caught in one scandal or another, sometimes in the very thing they preach most strongly against. This is no coincidence. Christians today in America want to display morality even if they lack it.

Humility
Let us take an example that I see frequently: humility. Christians want to be humble. This is not a bad thing (perhaps not what Nietzsche saw as the best goal, but not “wrong”). Yet Christians today, especially those in America, seem to enjoy displaying their lack of humility.

For example, one person I know is a technophile. He loves gadgets and has very expensive toys all over his house. But yet he claims at church groups to be humble. If one were to walk into his house, devoid of any context from him, I believe the exact opposite would be thought. “Simple, humble” people do not tend to live extravagantly, especially to the excess that he does and on the small budget he has. To drive this point home even further, another author here (Thainamu) recently posted a beginning to a series called “Simple Living in the 21st Century.” Just as simple living is a lifestyle and not just a display, so is moral living.

To bring this back to Nietzsche once more, the extravagant living can be associated with the Dionysian** trend. The Dionysian is marked by extreme excess. It is contrasted by the Apollinian (some translators write Apollonian) which is marked by tempered control. Neither can live without the other because one must have an encounter with the excess of the Dionysian in order to harness it in the Apollinian. This is where the practical nature of simple living and morality is born.

* Most of Nietzsche’s work is divided into aphorisms. It is common practice to refer to the aphorism, rather than the page number, because it is the same regardless of translation.

** Later works of Nietzsche redefine Dionysian as something else, which becomes for Nietzsche the highest valuation of life.


Archives

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'morality' tag.

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'morality' tag.

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'morality' tag.