Tag Archive for 'hillary_clinton'

Weekly Links: Charlie Gibson’s Obama Beatdown and More…

While I was waiting for my now obsolete HDDVD player to warm up and play season 8 of Seinfeld, I caught the best part of ABC’s democratic debate - not an exchange between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, but Charlie Gibson educating Obama on how capital gains taxes work (2:20-5:22):

Gibson outlines how every time the capital gains tax was raised, total revenue went down. The reason this works, by the way, is exampled in the Laffer Curve. Obama doesn’t even deal with the facts of this case, but responds to say (despite the fact that raising it will bring in less revenue), it should be raised “because of fairness.”

Obama indicates that he could care less about how well the government actually works, but is more interested in the ideals of socialism. It is more important that rich people be punished, rather than taxes be collected efficiently.

More on Obama
(From Jew) Obama’s recent comments imply a “functionalist view of religious conviction” that “is not concerned with the truthfulness of these beliefs, but only with the effects the beliefs have on the believer.”

A speech from 2006 reveals a similar pattern of thought in Obama’s beliefs about the functional importance of religion.

[Americans] want a sense of purpose, a narrative arc to their lives. They’re looking to relieve a chronic loneliness, a feeling supported by a recent study that shows Americans have fewer close friends and confidants than ever before. And so they need an assurance that somebody out there cares about them, is listening to them – that they are not just destined to travel down a long highway towards nothingness.

Obama does mention the whole “forgiveness of sins” idea, although he fails to mention repentance. (And Mr. Obama, I think you should refer to Jesus Christ as a savior, not an ally.)

[Faith] doesn’t mean that you don’t have doubts. You need to come to church precisely because you are of this world, not apart from it; you need to embrace Christ precisely because you have sins to wash away – because you are human and need an ally in your difficult journey.

But he seems to get confused about the importance of the truth. (Here’s a tip, Obama: if you traveled the same path as a Muslim or a Jew, then you don’t understand the truth and you aren’t saved.)

I felt I heard God’s spirit beckoning me. I submitted myself to His will, and dedicated myself to discovering His truth.

The path I traveled has been shared by millions upon millions of Americans – evangelicals, Catholics, Protestants, Jews and Muslims alike; some since birth, others at a turning point in their lives. It is not something they set apart from the rest of their beliefs and values. In fact, it is often what drives them.

It seems that Obama’s faith is rooted in social justice, not in things above.

I believed and still believe in the power of the African-American religious tradition to spur social change, a power made real by some of the leaders here today. … I was able to see faith as more than just a comfort to the weary or a hedge against death; it is an active, palpable agent in the world. It is a source of hope.

It was because of these newfound understandings that I was finally able to walk down the aisle of Trinity United Church of Christ one day and affirm my Christian faith.

More Links This Week
New Statesman article on NT Wright

The Filipino rice shortage we mentioned a couple weeks ago isn’t just in the Philippines. It’s global. CNN reports food riots in Haiti, Bangladesh, Egypt, and Mozambique. Rice prices have shot up 75%, wheat 120%. Corn prices are up too.

Glenn Beck argues that the US should lower it’s corporate tax rates.

CEOs Pushing Ayn Rand Studies Use Money to Overcome Resistance

The Trillion Dollar War:

These runaway costs do not include a single dollar from the Pentagon’s annual operating budget, which in 2008 reached a whopping $481 billion. If the war were being accounted for based on a rational, transparent budget process instead of an opaque and politicized shell game, Americans would be painfully aware that we are now in the seventh year of what the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has called a $1 trillion war.

How much money is $1 trillion? Enough to pay for the entire 1976 federal budget, adjusted for inflation. Enough to write a check for $37,500 to every Iraqi man, woman, and child. Enough to buy 169,492 Black Hawk helicopters, or 455 stealth bombers. Enough, in nominal terms, to pay for the entire federal government from 1789 to 1957. And it’s 10 times more than what specialists predict it would take to eradicate malaria once and for all.

Weekly Links: Obama’s Global Tax Giveaway

It appears that Barack Obama’s global tax proposal is up for Senate vote. I have not been super-down on Obama because he has seemed to emphasize a strong respect for individual civil rights. It would appear, however, that his ideals for fiscal policy are downright terrifying.

According to the link:

A nice-sounding bill called the “Global Poverty Act,” sponsored by Democratic presidential candidate and Senator Barack Obama, is up for a Senate vote on Thursday and could result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States. The bill, which has the support of many liberal religious groups, makes levels of U.S. foreign aid spending subservient to the dictates of the United Nations.

However, I want to make a warning to conservatives, before they jump on the bandwagon to strike at the Illinois Senator. The power vested in the congress to do this was allowed and even encouraged at times by conservatives. The conservatives wanted the power to do conservative things like make wars and fund “strategic alliances.” But conservatives don’t remain in charge forever (even if under that name). This is the nature of power - it creates a vacuum that attracts abuse. For example, conservatives who support all the increased surveillance, identification and detention need to consider what a Hillary Clinton or even more radical leftist would do with these powers.

This is part of the inherent failures of even so called “modern” government systems. Whereas democracies falter because the people elect autocratic planners and leaders to do everything for them, republics fall because laws get passed that give significant power to the law-makers. This is what happens when principles are compromised for expediency.

Politiques
Scalia believes that torture might be okay in certain circumstances

Paul Edwards at Townhall.com defends the Religious Right against the Religious Left: “The Religious Left is successfully redefining what it means to be a conservative evangelical by misrepresenting what it means to be a conservative evangelical.”

L’Eglise
A review of the next book in the Emerging conversation…

Saudi witch to be executed

Parents Fous
Sixth grade girls basketball game turns ugly in Oregon

Weekly Links: Romney Gone, Ebay Changes, M-Words

Mitt Romney has officially suspended his campaign. But at this website, we really don’t care about Mitt Romney, so the more important question is: what does this mean for Ron Paul?

The Death Blow Scenario - With Mitt Romney out, that leaves Huckabee, McCain and Paul going for the nomination. Romney’s supporters will likely back Huckabee over McCain, but some will pick McCain. With Romney’s votes, McCain gets the required delegates to make it to the convention unopposed. Ron Paul drifts quietly into the night.

The Brokered Convention Scenario - If Huckabee drops out soon, then Christians, pro-lifers and immigration advocates only have one rational choice - Ron Paul. Pro-war republicans will have to swallow their dislike of Paul, and vote for him because McCain holds positions closer to Hillary Clinton than Ronald Reagan.

What the media doesn’t get in all of this (but McCain and Huckabee are very aware of this) is that Ron Paul has significantly more delegates than his poll numbers would indicate. His campaign reported 42 after Super Tuesday. He won’t have enough to win, but he may have enough to be the kingmaker in a brokered convention.

eBay Changes Feedback Structure
eBay stops the tit-for-tat feedback cycle that has been happening lately. The problem is that sellers are conserably more likely to leave retaliatory feedback. The new rules are designed to fix this by basically removing sellers from the feedback equation.

As both a buyer and seller on eBay, I can definitely confirm that the seller has way to much advantage in the current feedback system. However, the problem could be fixed if this issue were looked at more fundamentally. The sellers are claiming that they have rights to leave the last word on feedback because “buyer satisfaction” is part of their requirements. In other words, unless the buyer leaves positive feedback, then they haven’t “completed” their part of the transaction. I think this is garbage - a petty excuse to preserve an etiquette system that allows them to retaliate. I propose that the seller should be required to leave feedback once they have shipped the item (this is when the item is legally the buyer’s responsibility) or the buyer has confirmed they have received the item. Are you listening eBay? I propose!

Money
Wesley Snipes was acquitted of tax fraud, conspiracy.
Euros are starting to become accepted in New York city.

Maniacism
FBI wants palm prints, eye scans, tattoo mapping

Medicine
Assisted suicide, sans doctor, in Oregon. Husband arrested for murder of wife with Lou Gehrig’s Disease.
Finnish patient gets new jaw from own stem cells

Ministry
5 Reasons Why The Emergining Church Is Fading
Cigarette Silence: When will the Church comment on the evils of Big Tobacco?


Archives

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'hillary_clinton' tag.

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'hillary_clinton' tag.

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'hillary_clinton' tag.