Tag Archive for 'evangelicals'

Ron Paul Throws His Weight Behind the Constitution Party

In a somewhat surprising move, Ron Paul has chosen to buck his libertarian roots and endorse the Constitution Party’s Chuck Baldwin for President. In a long, very personal and very revealing piece, Paul makes a couple of observations about this decision and his run at the White House. This one stuck out:

Ironically the most difficult group to recruit has been the evangelicals who supported McCain and his pro-war positions.  They have been convinced that they are obligated to initiate preventive war in the Middle East for theological reasons.  Fortunately, this is a minority of the Christian community, but our doors remain open to all despite this type of challenge.  The point is, new devotees to the freedom philosophy are more likely to come from the left than from those conservatives who have been convinced that God has instructed us to militarize the Middle East.

Paul, like many of us Christians who deeply lament the unbiblical support from our brothers and sisters of offensive war, murder, lying and blasphemy - and those who have sold themselves out to John McCain’s “evil” because it is “less evil” than Barack Obama’s “evil” has decided to embrace a genuinely Christian candidate in Chuck Baldwin. From the pastor himself:

For one thing, a sizeable number of believers allowed President George W. Bush to redefine their Christian principles almost out of existence. They willingly looked the other way while Bush betrayed his word (not to mention the Constitution) and catapulted conservative principles into outer darkness. To the point, that they can now even support someone as liberal as John McCain and still call him a “conservative.”

I will say it straight out: any Christian or conservative who supports John McCain has no principles left worth defending!

…How could Christians sacrifice their principles and convictions so easily? How could they be so willing to surrender their loyalties–both to Christ as the organic Sovereign of this land, and to constitutional government, which is, itself, built on Biblical principles?

There it is: countless millions of professing Christians will eagerly abandon their commitment to constitutional government and Biblical principles in order to accommodate a Republican Presidential candidate. In the minds of many Christians, the Republican Party is more important than the U.S. Constitution. It is more important than conservative principles or even Biblical injunctions. In essence, the Republican Party has become an IDOL in the hearts and minds of many professing believers.

So, how can we ask God to bless America when God’s children have set up the groves of idolatry in their hearts? How can we expect God to heal our land when Christian pastors, Sunday School teachers, deacons, ushers, and faithful church members place more loyalty and allegiance in a political party than they do in the very Word and principles of God?

As surely as the pagans of the Old Testament worshipped before the gods of Baal and Ashteroth, many Christians worship before the GOP. They are willing to sacrifice their children to the policies and practices of unscrupulous, evil politicians–as long as they have an “R” behind their names.

We have a major problem in the church, let alone the conservative political movement when so many claim they agree with the authority of Christ and the bible and yet, out of ignorance or stubborn human-centered pride, support policies that are so blatantly and radically unbiblical and unchristian. There is probably more hope with the left’s base, who though dead wrong on principle, at least seem to understand the concept of principle. It may be easier to convince them that their motives, while correct, are not carried out through socialism, wealth-redistribution, pluralism and so called religious and cultural “tolerance.”

The Christian “right” has gone full-circle this decade. What started as an effort to align one of the major parties with a God-fearing agenda has turned into a power struggle to align God-fearing people with a major party agenda. Paul sees that the mainstream of political Christianity has been so caught up in what these false prophets, teachers and experts are proclaiming that it is time to “evangelize” the left.

Realistically, Paul’s positions have generally been closer to the Constitution Party that the hard-line of the Libertarian Party. Paul’s emphasis on Rothbardian/Austrian economics and his opposition to the drug war makes him friends with the Libertarians, but his views on immigration, Christianity and abortion align him more with the Old Right and Constitution Party.

With this endorsement Paul has shown his true colours, even though it will not make a lot of sense to those who supported him from the left.  Once again, he has chosen to follow his principles over politics, and pick a hard-core Christian “libertarian-esque” candidate who emphasises those principles which Paul finds most important.

Here is Paul and Baldwin talking in 2007 about Christian/conservative issues.

Weekly Links: The Fed’s Coup, Life for Hoarding, and More

Business and Politics
U.S. considers overhaul of financial industry.

Minnesota’s smoking ban has wrought unintended consequences.

Controversy over a religious statue placed outside a Tennessee courthouse.

There is a looming rice shortage in the Philippines. The government is threatening rice hoarders with life in prison.

There Is No Gas Shortage

Al Qaeda does not target innocents. Also, bin Laden is alive and in good health.

Interesting take on Hillary’s “misspeak.”

Science and Technology
Microsoft’s brand has declined in the last four years. The article doesn’t say why Microsoft’s reputation is in decline, but it gives a hint:

Microsoft, which has been diversifying its business beyond packaged software in the past several years, has struggled to articulate how the many facets of its business — software, entertainment and online among them — show a cohesive business plan.

Microsoft’s brand is diluted by its breadth. People don’t know what Microsoft represents anymore.

Speculate much? UK astronomers have discovered the youngest known planet. It’s only 1,600 years old. The next youngest known planet is 10 million years old. One wonders how they figure these things out. Do planets come with birthdays tattooed on their rings?

Christianity
From Christianity Today: Not Your Father’s L’Abri - The Swiss retreat now tends less to philosophical skeptics than to disaffected evangelicals.

The Kiwi enters the debate on how much context matters

An olderish NT Wright interview Really good to watch if you’re still confused about his views.

Blue Like Jazz: The Movie

Evangelicals and History

During my Philosophy of History class a few years back we spent some time discussing Nietzsche’s famous quote “A lack of historical sense is the congenital defect of all philosophers.” It’s an interesting quote, whose merits can be debated for I’d like to, for a moment, not apply it to philosophers but to evangelicals. A lack of historical sense is the congenital defect of all evangelical.

Now of course there will be some who break the mold on this one, but when you look at the evangelical movement could you honestly say that most evangelicals have a grasp of church history? Protestant history? Even their own evangelical history? The church history that most evangelicals I know goes something like this; “After the book of acts things in the church began to get really bad. The Roman Catholic Church rose up and the land was without a pure gospel until Luther came and left the Roman Catholic Church. Now today we are continuing on sharing the gospel from the Reformation.” Ok, maybe it’s not quite that bad, but there is no denying their grasp of church history is lacking.

You would think that at minimal evangelicals would want to know their own history well. But how many take time to learn about the activities of the Wesleys, Whitefield, Edwards, and the others who began the movement during the First Great Awakening? What about what happened during the Second Great Awakening and Charles Finney? DL Moody? Charles Spurgeon? Billy Sunday? Evangelicals can usually remember back about 50 years with Billy Graham, but before that they are drawing a blank.

Why is this? Why do we (I am including myself in this as well. This is an area of study I’m growing into) not know our own history, not to mention the history of the church as a whole? Go into a typical evangelical church and ask how many Early Church Father’s names most people know? St. Augustine, St. Jerome? I think it has to do with the belief that evangelical history is a-historical.

The evangelical understanding of scripture, being a perfect inspired text that can be read and understood by anyone anywhere, has turned it into an a-historical document. History doesn’t matter to scripture becasue the bible’s message is outside of history. Once this is understood then history doesn’t matter to the Christian becasue their faith is based on an a-historical document. What past saints have said about it, fought over, died over, doesn’t matter becasue I have the truth in my hands and an examination of the past will not add anything to it’s truth.

We need to begin to understand that although the truth of scripture may be outside of history God entered into history to deliver it, and we are historical beings reading it. The truths of scripture may be timeless, but the people and culture they are applied to are not. An understanding of how other people in other times and places understood the bible and dealt with it can add to our own understanding of scripture.

Besides this, evangelicals need to accept that they are only part of the body of Christ. By cutting ourselves off from the past we are severing our connection with the past saints who are just as much part of that body as we are, which adds to the isolation and lack of community that is a problem in our independent evangelical mindset today.

I’m not saying I have all the answers, or that I am not effected by this problem myself, but it would seem to me that we all should go and read an old book written by some Christians who have past into glory long ago and learn from them a bit more then we now do.


Archives

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'evangelicals' tag.

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'evangelicals' tag.

December 2008
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'evangelicals' tag.