Tag Archive for 'chris_dodd'

Democrat’s New Surveillance Bill Reveals the Futility of Political Idealism

Everyone was ticked off a couple months ago (well, everyone except the Bush Administration, their lackeys and the telecommunications corporations) when congress gave these companies retroactive immunity from possible lawsuits resulting from them handing over all manner of personal information to the government.

When it happened, the democrats were absolutely indignant - vowing to do everything in their power to fix this aggregious violation of citizen’s basic rights. Chris Dodd even made a whole page on his website devoted to stopping the bill. He pleaded:

Email the Senate and ask that they vote against any legislation that includes retroactive immunity for telecoms. It’s time to see the Senate stand up for the rule of law. You don’t demonstrate leadership in the footnotes of a press release, or parroting responses from focus groups. Leadership is demonstrated through action.

Naturally, the democrats went on to totally cave.

But never fear, House democrats have proposed a new security bill. As I ran to read the press release, I couldn’t wait to see the fighting words that would ensure. This is what I got:

Under the proposed legislation, the companies would be able to argue their cases in court and present classified evidence to a judge during a closed proceeding without the presence of the plaintiffs.

So basically, the telecommunications lawyers will get to make their defense in secret, without the prosecution witnessing their arguments or evidence. No constitutional violation there! The democrats are going to trade immunity for more secret courts and infallibly powerful judges. It’s like a contest to see who can set up the largest, most secretive government in the name of national security.

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. We always have to take a step back in situations like this and remember that we are dealing with politicians - they are the scum of the earth for a reason. In order to succeed in politics, one must have no backbone, no ideals and no courage. Politicians argue to define the extremes of an issue and than come together in agreement to blindly follow the middle course - no matter how skewed it has become.

This is how the republican party has shifted from constitutional conservatism to big-brother fascism, and the democratic party has shifted from working-class compassion to international socialism. The art of compromise is clearly not about finding the best option through rational debate and institutions, but about figuring out by how many degrees the heat can be turned up on the proverbial frog in boiling water.

The New Draft

In the CNN/YouTube Democratice Debate the other night, Hillary Clinton and Chris Dodd were doing their best to one-up each other on universalizing a service that America is one of the last countries to mandate. No, this is not yet another health care article. The service: labor.

I don’t mean to sound alarmist here, that work camps and total command of the labor market are around the corner. But the first steps were loudly applauded at the debate. It was fitting that the subject was brought up in a question about the military draft. Dodd started the contest:

I’m an advocate of universal nation service, not by mandating it, but one of the things I’m missing in our country is the shared experience… I want to see every American given the opportunity to serve their country in some way. I think we need to do more of that in the United States today. Elections ought to be more than just about a series of issues, but the shared experiences of service. It’s so important that every American have that opportunity. It’s something I strongly advocate and would advocate as president.

Dodd says he isn’t going to mandate it – just make it available – as if charities and various service organizations are desperate for more volunteers right now. No, the government clearly needs to spend a decent chunk of change to make a new “public service” program.

However, it will be mandated - 100 hours per person before they graduate high school. Again, not labor-camp material - but it is labor camp principle.

Clinton, not to be undone in collectivist rhetoric, let slip the fact that she would go the extra mile with such a plan:

I agree completely with Chris. We’ve got to look for more ways for universal national service. I’ve introduced legislation for a public service academy that would be patterned on great institutions like The Citadel and our military academies. Because we’ve got to get young people back into public service. And the other night we had a provision in our bill that we passed to have people who go into public service have their student loans deferred and even forgiven. We need to do more to support public service.

I bet most people didn’t know that this issue is already being legislated right now. I sure didn’t. I find it fascinating that no politician would support the draft (although they’ve never taken it off the books) yet several seem to still support the premise behind it – that government has a right to your labor, time and productive effort. That somehow, each individual owes it to their country to give these things without question – with the sole reason being platitudes about “shared experience” or sacrifice as a virtue.

Another crazy lady in her own way, Ayn Rand, while foaming at the mouth over things such as this, nailed the essence of this kind of program on the head:

No man can have a right to impose an unchosen obligation, an unrewarded duty or an involuntary servitude on another man.

While obviously we aren’t talking about involuntary servitude in the terms that we usually think of it – the principle is still the same here. That the government may soon demand some portion of each citizen’s time without a realistic option to quit or defer. Remember, that this question was not asked but the candidates felt safe enough on the subject to volunteer this information. It received some of the loudest applause of the night when statements against a military draft (as opposed to a labor draft) were also applauded. In other words, Americans are still to naive about the principles this country was founded on to discern one form of involuntary servitude for another.


Archives

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'chris_dodd' tag.

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'chris_dodd' tag.

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for 'chris_dodd' tag.