Everyone was ticked off a couple months ago (well, everyone except the Bush Administration, their lackeys and the telecommunications corporations) when congress gave these companies retroactive immunity from possible lawsuits resulting from them handing over all manner of personal information to the government.
When it happened, the democrats were absolutely indignant - vowing to do everything in their power to fix this aggregious violation of citizen’s basic rights. Chris Dodd even made a whole page on his website devoted to stopping the bill. He pleaded:
Email the Senate and ask that they vote against any legislation that includes retroactive immunity for telecoms. It’s time to see the Senate stand up for the rule of law. You don’t demonstrate leadership in the footnotes of a press release, or parroting responses from focus groups. Leadership is demonstrated through action.
Naturally, the democrats went on to totally cave.
But never fear, House democrats have proposed a new security bill. As I ran to read the press release, I couldn’t wait to see the fighting words that would ensure. This is what I got:
Under the proposed legislation, the companies would be able to argue their cases in court and present classified evidence to a judge during a closed proceeding without the presence of the plaintiffs.
So basically, the telecommunications lawyers will get to make their defense in secret, without the prosecution witnessing their arguments or evidence. No constitutional violation there! The democrats are going to trade immunity for more secret courts and infallibly powerful judges. It’s like a contest to see who can set up the largest, most secretive government in the name of national security.
I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. We always have to take a step back in situations like this and remember that we are dealing with politicians - they are the scum of the earth for a reason. In order to succeed in politics, one must have no backbone, no ideals and no courage. Politicians argue to define the extremes of an issue and than come together in agreement to blindly follow the middle course - no matter how skewed it has become.
This is how the republican party has shifted from constitutional conservatism to big-brother fascism, and the democratic party has shifted from working-class compassion to international socialism. The art of compromise is clearly not about finding the best option through rational debate and institutions, but about figuring out by how many degrees the heat can be turned up on the proverbial frog in boiling water.
Recent Comments
Colin, Darius T, Atanamis, Jew, Darius T
Colin, Atanamis, Jew, Atanamis, Colin [...]
Atanamis, Chris A, Darius T, Colin, Atanamis [...]
Colin, TANK
bob, cchrisr, Redski, cchrisr, Redski [...]
Michael, Atanamis, Hungry Sasquatch, James Lansberry, Jasen Tracy [...]
jokerneck1q, Stan R, Chris A, bob, Jasen Tracy [...]
Chris A, bob, bob, Darius T, Darius T [...]