Cultures are identified by their stories, and the Church is a culture. It follows that they Church too is defined by her story. But what is that story?
-Peter J. Leithart, Against Christianity
If you were to spend some time in a Christian Church today, would you be able to discover what their story is from the preaching you hear? More often then not, Christian preaching disregards the story. This happens in one of two ways:
First, the story is told, but only as a means to draw out abstract theoretical considerations. What happened is therefore of far less importance then the abstractions that can be drawn out of it an universally applied to the Church.
Second, the story is not told, and instead what is offered as preaching is not anything drawn from the Christian story, but from the stories of the world around us. Pop psychology, self-help, and the latest in cultural trends become the message delivered to the people.
Is it any surprise then that we have a generation of Christians who either are full of only theoretical knowledge, or Christians who are nothing other then moralists? But these two things are only the way the story is disregarded, we should before going any further, answer Dr. Leithart’s question about what our story is.
The answer should be obvious, and every Christian knows it, they just simply don’t understand what it means. The story, the Church’s story, is our history. Beginning in the beginning, through the Old and New Testaments, through the early Church, the medieval period, the Reformation, the revivals, and right to today. Unfortunately, the Church has not only forgotten it’s history, but has actively sought to at best limit the importance given to it, and at worse repudiate it. All that is allowed to be discussed as the history of the church is what can be found in the scriptures from the death of Christ onwards.
The Old Testament is nice for children’s stories that offer good morals (which shows just how little these stories are stripped of what they actually say and are made into abstracts), but is really the history of the Jews. After the New Testament the Church began to go bad very fast so we can learn very little from it. The Reformation was a great period in Church history, but lets keep with the slogans we have inherited from it and understand them outside of any context. Revivals are great, but let us not study the First Great Awakening. I once read some of “Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God” and it’s obviously not what the Church needs today. No, lets keep with what we have today, let us remember no more past Billy Graham. We have the truth, and it’s unchangeable so why worry about the past anyway?
This view has set the Church adrift. We are swept along with whatever currents come our way because although we may have a a solid ground under the waves in the form of scripture, we have no way to anchor to it anymore.
Stories have the ability to anchor to something. They connect us, and bind us to something, yet more then that they conform us to it. By reading the Church’s stories, we learn what it is to live the life of someone following after God. Although abstract theological knowledge has it’s place, it cannot, in practice, conform us to anything. We may learn what we are to do in general, but stories show us, in specific instances, how God’s people in the past dealt with how to live out their faith.
Christians today can deal in the abstraction, in the theoretical, but put them into flesh and blood situations and they no longer know what to do. No one has trained them how to act as Christians, how to follow after Christ in practice. That is the job of stories, they show us what we can be, what we should be. They show the failures we may have, and the successes that are possible.
More then that, if the Church has lost it’s own stories, it must seek new ones out. Every culture, every institution, needs something to conform to; it needs stories to remember who it is. The Church, in giving up it’s own stories, has embraced the world’s stories. Secular humanism is the story that has crept into the Church. Our stories allowed us to speak to all issues of society; politics, medicine, finance, religion…etc. Today, with the stories we appropriated into the church we can speak only on religion.
This is the tragedy of modernity for the Church. We’ve embraced the story of it, and by doing so have relegated us to observer, occasional commentator, but mostly leftover appendage trying to find something, anything but our own story, to rally around. The Church must re-discover it’s history, it’s story. It needs to look again at the Old Testament, and take seriously the people and stories in it. It needs to look at it’s glorious, and sometimes not-so-glorious, history and rally around it. Hold it up as what it means to follow after Christ, learn from it, and use it as boundaries to keep us walking on the same path we have for all of history.
The Church must become radical again. We must cast off the philosophical positions that was not just pushed on us, but often readily embraced. We need to begin once again work out the implications of the gospel (that is the announcement that Jesus is Lord, that He has begun to set up His Kingdom and will allow no rival one) and begin to apply it to all areas of our lives. Only then will the world take note of the Church, only then will the world will realize the power of Christ, only then will the world see the threat that the Church posses to it.

Bryan, you outdid yourself on this one. You really hit the nail on the head on a number of points. I thought I was the only one who felt that way about “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.” Not too long ago someone I know referred to it as the greatest sermon ever preached. I’m like, “What?” And this guy is a good preacher in his own right. I’m sure he’s preached better sermons than than himself.
But yeah, I think we are trying to be relevant while undermining ourselves by trying to relate to society based on their terms. Thanks for writing this. There’s so much here worth considering.
Bryan –
How do you suggest Christians go about curing their ignorance of history? Any particular books or authors you recommend?
I believe Bryan was being facetious when he refered to “Sinners…” But I could be mistaken.
“I believe Bryan was being facetious when he refered to “Sinners…” But I could be mistaken.”
Oh. I think you’re right. How embarrassing. Either way, the article is excellent.
Yeah, that is a bit embarrassing.
Don, I’m in the process right now of slowly trying to learn the history of the church so I am by no means an expert on this. I will however give the answer I usually do when your question comes up:
1. Find a good, but general, work on the history of the church. When I started this process I used The Story of Christianity By Justo L. Gonzalez (Volume 1, and Volume 2 since it’s a very broad introduction.
2. See what parts of it you find interesting
3. Find out what are the best resources on those parts
4. Get your hands on those resources and read/watch them
Now by best resources I mean both primary and secondary sources. For example, I’m just beginning to look at medieval Christianity. I’ll be doing this likely for a few years off and on just like I did with the First Great Awakening. So knowing a bit about medieval theology and philosophy I knew right away that if I want to understand this time of the Church’s history I needed to understand Boethius and Aquinas so I went out and got stuff BY (not about, but by) them. Once I’m done reading some of their own work, I’ll be looking at getting a biography on Aquinas (Boethius would be harder find one on) I’ll also be looking at getting a history book specifically dealing with the middle ages so I can decide where to branch my research off to. If there is writings from that time about the current situation, all the better. I always want to read primary sources first.
That might give some idea of how I’m trying to go and do this.
As for SIHAG, I should write up a whole entry on that and JE one day. Most people don’t know that JE preached it many times before the revival began without must impact. Also, many people don’t now that Billy Graham himself preached a version of it. I would not go as far as calling it the greatest sermon ever (although I do like it), but it is a decent example of the preaching of the time. My point with brining it up was the fact that because it’s the main sermon associated with the First Great Awaking people who don’t like it usually don’t look beyond it to see what was actually going on during the awakening. If you want to read a sermon by JE I would first recommend: “A Divine and Supernatural Light, Immediately Imparted To The Soul By The Spirit Of God, Shown To be Both Scriptural And Rational Doctrine” which can be found in his complete works Volume Two on CCLE.
My comment isn’t directly related to your point, but is related indirectly.
You might find these links interesting:
http://www.chronologicalbiblestorying.com/
http://www.onestory.org/Default.aspx
Stories are primarily told orally, a fact you allude to when you point out that preaching often does not tell our story (of course, stories are written too, but it is the written stories, in the Bible, that are not told orally or are often not even read).
The parachurch organization of which I am a part has in recent years developed oral strategies to use in cultures that are preliterate, or places where the economics will never be such to support a literature. Technology is at a point to make this doable with things like the Megavoice player http://www.megavoice.com/.
Bryan, my question is the same as Don’s, but I want to know how to do it in FIVE MINUTES!
Thainamu, that Megavoice player is awesome. We had one in our church they let us borrow for demonstration purposes. Truly amazing!