<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of Left and Right</title>
	<link>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Jasen Tracy</title>
		<link>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8045</link>
		<author>Jasen Tracy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8045</guid>
					<description>You don't mean the left is for state's rights do you?  I assume you mean more power for government in general, but it's unclear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t mean the left is for state&#8217;s rights do you?  I assume you mean more power for government in general, but it&#8217;s unclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8046</link>
		<author>Colin</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8046</guid>
					<description>The "traditional" left argued a strong state's rights position. This has been completely abandoned recently, but even within the past 30 years, this was a common position coming from the left, particularly in the south.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;traditional&#8221; left argued a strong state&#8217;s rights position. This has been completely abandoned recently, but even within the past 30 years, this was a common position coming from the left, particularly in the south.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris A</title>
		<link>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8048</link>
		<author>Chris A</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8048</guid>
					<description>Here is an interesting tidbit about state's rights you may not have read about in the mainstream news. The other day the state of Oklahoma passed Joint House Resolution 1089 (92-3) to reassert it's states rights under the Tenth Amendment. The resolution was authored by Charles Key, a Republican. It reads:

 A Joint Resolution claiming sovereignty under the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States over certain powers; serving notice to the
federal government to cease and desist certain
mandates; and directing distribution.

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States reads as follows:

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to
the States respectively, or to the people."; and

WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal
power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the
United States and no more; and

WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means
that the federal government was created by the states specifically
to be an agent of the states; and

WHEREAS, today, in 2008, the states are demonstrably treated as
agents of the federal government; and

WHEREAS, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and

WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York
v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not
simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the
states; and

WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and
some now pending from the present administration and from Congress
may further violate the Constitution of the United States.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
AND THE SENATE OF THE 2ND SESSION OF THE 51ST OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE:

THAT the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all
powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal
government by the Constitution of the United States.

THAT this serve as Notice and Demand to the federal government,
as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates
that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated
powers.

THAT a copy of this resolution be distributed to the President
of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the
Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate of each state’s
legislature of the United States of America, and each member of the
Oklahoma Congressional Delegation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an interesting tidbit about state&#8217;s rights you may not have read about in the mainstream news. The other day the state of Oklahoma passed Joint House Resolution 1089 (92-3) to reassert it&#8217;s states rights under the Tenth Amendment. The resolution was authored by Charles Key, a Republican. It reads:</p>
<p> A Joint Resolution claiming sovereignty under the<br />
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United<br />
States over certain powers; serving notice to the<br />
federal government to cease and desist certain<br />
mandates; and directing distribution.</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United<br />
States reads as follows:</p>
<p>&#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the<br />
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to<br />
the States respectively, or to the people.&#8221;; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal<br />
power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the<br />
United States and no more; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means<br />
that the federal government was created by the states specifically<br />
to be an agent of the states; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, today, in 2008, the states are demonstrably treated as<br />
agents of the federal government; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, many federal mandates are directly in violation of the<br />
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York<br />
v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not<br />
simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the<br />
states; and</p>
<p>WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and<br />
some now pending from the present administration and from Congress<br />
may further violate the Constitution of the United States.</p>
<p>NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES<br />
AND THE SENATE OF THE 2ND SESSION OF THE 51ST OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE:</p>
<p>THAT the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the<br />
Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all<br />
powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal<br />
government by the Constitution of the United States.</p>
<p>THAT this serve as Notice and Demand to the federal government,<br />
as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates<br />
that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated<br />
powers.</p>
<p>THAT a copy of this resolution be distributed to the President<br />
of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the<br />
Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate of each state’s<br />
legislature of the United States of America, and each member of the<br />
Oklahoma Congressional Delegation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris A</title>
		<link>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8049</link>
		<author>Chris A</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8049</guid>
					<description>But if I can stay more on topic, I think Noam Chomsky was right when he said that we don't have a two party system, but a one party system with two factions. Its just that the factions are losing their distinctions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if I can stay more on topic, I think Noam Chomsky was right when he said that we don&#8217;t have a two party system, but a one party system with two factions. Its just that the factions are losing their distinctions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jew</title>
		<link>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8074</link>
		<author>Jew</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8074</guid>
					<description>I'd be more impressed with the Oklahoma resolution if they mentioned some specific acts and laws that they believe violate the state's rights. I'd be even more surprised if Oklahoma actually tries to do anything about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be more impressed with the Oklahoma resolution if they mentioned some specific acts and laws that they believe violate the state&#8217;s rights. I&#8217;d be even more surprised if Oklahoma actually tries to do anything about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris A</title>
		<link>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8224</link>
		<author>Chris A</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://zealfortruth.org/2008/07/the-death-of-left-and-right/#comment-8224</guid>
					<description>Jew, I agree. They don't directly address anything, possibly because that would have delayed or prevented the resolution's passing. I don't know. 

But to shed a little more light on what prompted this resolution, it was partly because a federal judge blocked portions of Oklahoma's immigration laws. The laws there are pretty hardcore and are aimed at getting rid of illegal immigrants. I would say this is mostly a labor thing. In Oklahoma, transporting or harboring an illegal alien is considered a criminal act. And businesses and contractors are equally liable to determine the legal eligibility of each employee. So Wal-Mart, for instance, can't hire a company who hires "undocumented" workers and say that they didn't know about it. 

I think it is a shame that illegal aliens are becoming the nation's scapegoats. I personally feel for them and understand that they are trying to make a better life for themselves and their families. They've been getting mixed messages from this country for a long time. In some states they are released from custody even after being apprehended for drunk driving, and its obvious that there is a demand for their labor. Some farmers would have to let their crops rot in the fields if it weren't for illegal workers. That's just a fact.

However, being somewhat familiar with the situation in Oklahoma, I understand why these vigilante Okies are up in arms. (I can say that because I'm from there.) Blue collar jobs whose wages were once protected by unions have been grossly affected by the neutering of union power and the influx of illegals. I know there are probably people on this blog that are ideologically opposed to unions, and I don't have an opinion one way or another so... I'm just saying that these two things - the death of unions and illegal workers - have coincided, driving down wages. In fact, the Republicans killed the unions through Right-to-Work legislation. And now these same Republicans are feeling the heat from their constituents, and are thus now supposedly against illegal workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jew, I agree. They don&#8217;t directly address anything, possibly because that would have delayed or prevented the resolution&#8217;s passing. I don&#8217;t know. </p>
<p>But to shed a little more light on what prompted this resolution, it was partly because a federal judge blocked portions of Oklahoma&#8217;s immigration laws. The laws there are pretty hardcore and are aimed at getting rid of illegal immigrants. I would say this is mostly a labor thing. In Oklahoma, transporting or harboring an illegal alien is considered a criminal act. And businesses and contractors are equally liable to determine the legal eligibility of each employee. So Wal-Mart, for instance, can&#8217;t hire a company who hires &#8220;undocumented&#8221; workers and say that they didn&#8217;t know about it. </p>
<p>I think it is a shame that illegal aliens are becoming the nation&#8217;s scapegoats. I personally feel for them and understand that they are trying to make a better life for themselves and their families. They&#8217;ve been getting mixed messages from this country for a long time. In some states they are released from custody even after being apprehended for drunk driving, and its obvious that there is a demand for their labor. Some farmers would have to let their crops rot in the fields if it weren&#8217;t for illegal workers. That&#8217;s just a fact.</p>
<p>However, being somewhat familiar with the situation in Oklahoma, I understand why these vigilante Okies are up in arms. (I can say that because I&#8217;m from there.) Blue collar jobs whose wages were once protected by unions have been grossly affected by the neutering of union power and the influx of illegals. I know there are probably people on this blog that are ideologically opposed to unions, and I don&#8217;t have an opinion one way or another so&#8230; I&#8217;m just saying that these two things - the death of unions and illegal workers - have coincided, driving down wages. In fact, the Republicans killed the unions through Right-to-Work legislation. And now these same Republicans are feeling the heat from their constituents, and are thus now supposedly against illegal workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
