Archive for August 6th, 2007

Changing Church Part.1

The church does most for the world when it is least like the world, whereas the church that tries very hard to be “relevant” to the world spells doom for itself and for the world.
-Simon Chan, Liturgical Theology

This is the introduction post to a series about the changing way worship is envisioned as occurring the church today.

There is today a growing movement to make the church in practice different from the world. This is counter to the past several generations. During that time the church was brought as close to the world as it could be in practice. A concerted effort was made to make the church as accessible and relevant to the world in hopes the such an effort would bring the world into the church. This effort had mixed results. In some churches large numerical increases in members occurred. In other churches members who did not like the changes left. Overall however the church in North America has been on the steady decline, and this attempt to shape the practices of the church to the world has not stopped this decline.

Partially in response to the kind of shallow spirituality the past several generations is perceived as producing, partially in disgust to the pragmatic philosophy the underlined the movement, and partially in an attempt to rediscover what it means to be the church, a movement is afoot to undo what the last several generations did by attempting to change church practice so it will more closely resemble older practices in church history. Perhaps the most obvious example of this is the recent decision by the Pope to make it easier for the Latin Mass to be used. Only a generation ago was the Latin Mass replaced with one that was thought to have more appeal. It is not clear how many churches will return to the old mass, but the decision by the Pope to allow it shows the growing belief that the recent changes in the church may not have been for the best.

Similar things are occurring in the Protestant world. The guitar music and almost concert like worship sets are increasingly coming into question. This is seen particularly well in writers from the Emerging Church. One of the main characteristics that define the Emerging Church fort Gibbs and Bolger in their excellent book Emerging Churches is “Merging ancient and contemporary spiritualities”. This includes re-introducing such practices as a liturgy, recited prayers, and the Lectio divina.

Many modern protestant churches view the Emerging Church as a threat becasue of this ancient spirituality that it is attempting to bring into the church. To many in the modern church it smells of Roman Catholicism and is not evangelical. On another level perhaps it is simply not what they are use to, and they want to hold on to their own traditions, while the Emerging Church wants to embrace an older tradition. In any event, the worship wars that existed over the type of music sung in church that died down over the past decade seem to once again be heating up over the practice of worship in church as a whole.

It would seem that a lot of people have begun to sit up and take notice that what the church has been doing for the past couple generations hasn’t worked. They have therefore decided to attempt to return to what the church has done in the past. In the next post in this series we will examine this movement a bit more by looking at some specific critiques of what the modern church has done.

Book Review: Finding Faith

Subtitle: A Self-discovery Guide for your Spiritual Quest 

By Brian McLaren

McLaren writes that the purpose of the book is not to give dogmatic answers or to tell us what to believe, but rather to help us find answers for ourselves and to help show us how to believe.

The main topics McLaren writes about in the book:

1. Why belief matters.
2. Difference between good faith and bad faith.
3. You can’t just think about faith, at some point you have to jump in and try it to understand it.
4. Scientific inquiry and logic cannot produce an absolute certain knowledge since the rules of logic etc.
5. Complete relativism is unworkable.
6. Revelation cannot produce absolute certainty.
7. Atheism cannot be proven.
8. An honest and inquisitive agnostic must give faith a try.
9. Pantheism, Polytheism, and Dualism cannot give an adequate basis for a solid ethical system like Monotheism can.
10. Addresses misconceptions about how a Monotheistic God must be like.
11. Addresses why all religions don’t lead to the same place.
12. Suggests ways to experience God.
13. How doubt can be a way to experience God and produce a stronger faith, that the opposite of faith isn’t doubt, it’s indifference.
14. Explains some of what it will cost to honestly peruse a deep faith, and what you might gain.
15. Says that a hope for reward or fear of punishment in the afterlife should not be factor in the quest for faith.
16. His personal experience of faith.

My favorite part of the book is a chapter called, “How Does Faith Grow.” In it, McLaren comes up with a system that labels the stages of faith a person might go through (and it fits fairly well with my experience).

Stage 1 - Simplicity
Stage 2 - Complexity
Stage 3 - Perplexity
Stage 4 - Humility

Simplicity - Being right means belonging to the right group, everything can be known, the group’s authorities know everything.

Complexity - Truth is found by using the right methods. Most everything can be known, but it sometimes takes a lot of work to find. Authorities are coaches that can help you grow.

Perplexity - Everything is uncertain, except uncertainty. Truth may be impossible to find. Authorities are of little or no help and may be purposefully manipulative for the sake of their power.

Humility - Truth can be understood to various degrees, there’s a lot of mystery. People should practice the saying, “In essentials, unity; in nonessentials, diversity; in all things, charity.” Authorities are people like ourselves.

The various stages have different strengths and weaknesses (and views on things of course); Stage 4 has the strengths of the previous 3 stages but also risks having the weaknesses of the previous 3 stages. People often leave a stage (many times unwillingly) for the next higher numbered one by the way of a faith crisis. This leads some to think that they’re losing their faith (except the ones going from stage 3 to 4).

These stages won’t cover everyone of course, but it provides a helpful framework. I think unreflective people may stay in stage 1, but that many people stay in stage 2 (maybe after a brief foray into stage 3, that is solved by finding better experts or authorities). Unfortunately, people in stage 3 may give up on their faith. McLaren suggests though that it’s sometimes a necessary thing to go though to get to stage 4.

Other than that chapter, I’m not sure that there is anything that unqiue in this book. However, it did make me feel better about not having as much certainty as I would like. I don’t know how this book would do with non-believers (especially those with no Christian background), but I would very highly recommend it for people from Christian backgrounds who are in stage 3.

Whatever else you say about Brian McLaren, and some people have said a alot, it has to be admitted that he is a highly skilled writer.  Of the handful of books of his I’ve read, Finding Faith is my favorite.   


Archives

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for the day Monday, August 6th, 2007.

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for the day Monday, August 6th, 2007.

August 2007
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

You are currently browsing the Zeal For Truth weblog archives for the day Monday, August 6th, 2007.